<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Happy New Year: The Future of Innovation</title>
	<link>http://www.design-management.de/archive/2009/01/happy-new-year-the-future-of-innovation/</link>
	<description>everything about design, management and business issues around designmanagement.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2</generator>

	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Happy New Year: The Future of Innovation by: hgh</title>
		<link>http://www.design-management.de/archive/2009/01/happy-new-year-the-future-of-innovation/#comment-622530</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 07:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.design-management.de/archive/2009/01/happy-new-year-the-future-of-innovation/#comment-622530</guid>
					<description>We always expect the new innovation for the future and for the design is the special thinking .. any the post is excellent and supper..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>We always expect the new innovation for the future and for the design is the special thinking .. any the post is excellent and supper..
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Happy New Year: The Future of Innovation by: Netty</title>
		<link>http://www.design-management.de/archive/2009/01/happy-new-year-the-future-of-innovation/#comment-604134</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 20:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.design-management.de/archive/2009/01/happy-new-year-the-future-of-innovation/#comment-604134</guid>
					<description>The future of innovation - well I always expect that the future bring innovations. I am sure this year also by design-management.de :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The future of innovation - well I always expect that the future bring innovations. I am sure this year also by design-management.de :-)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Happy New Year: The Future of Innovation by: jimmy</title>
		<link>http://www.design-management.de/archive/2009/01/happy-new-year-the-future-of-innovation/#comment-600577</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 06:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.design-management.de/archive/2009/01/happy-new-year-the-future-of-innovation/#comment-600577</guid>
					<description>Interesting post. I like to talk about the innovation &amp;#38; some creative things. I am 15 years old boy &amp;#38; i want to collect all new, used &amp;#38; some antique automotive photos. Normally i have collected some Used RVs, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ronsamericanrv.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Used Motorhomes&lt;/a&gt;, Truck etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Interesting post. I like to talk about the innovation &amp; some creative things. I am 15 years old boy &amp; i want to collect all new, used &amp; some antique automotive photos. Normally i have collected some Used RVs, <a href="http://www.ronsamericanrv.com" rel="nofollow">Used Motorhomes</a>, Truck etc.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Happy New Year: The Future of Innovation by: Fast payday advances</title>
		<link>http://www.design-management.de/archive/2009/01/happy-new-year-the-future-of-innovation/#comment-599933</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 02:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.design-management.de/archive/2009/01/happy-new-year-the-future-of-innovation/#comment-599933</guid>
					<description>Great post it is very informative thanks for the share!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Great post it is very informative thanks for the share!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Happy New Year: The Future of Innovation by: Pokerneuigkeiten</title>
		<link>http://www.design-management.de/archive/2009/01/happy-new-year-the-future-of-innovation/#comment-599742</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 10:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.design-management.de/archive/2009/01/happy-new-year-the-future-of-innovation/#comment-599742</guid>
					<description>Thanks for your information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Thanks for your information.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Happy New Year: The Future of Innovation by: Gunady</title>
		<link>http://www.design-management.de/archive/2009/01/happy-new-year-the-future-of-innovation/#comment-548151</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.design-management.de/archive/2009/01/happy-new-year-the-future-of-innovation/#comment-548151</guid>
					<description>Hey, I like this part of your idea:
&quot;it is something they want to do to become better at what they’re already good at.&quot; 

To some extent, I agree that we should innovate based on user's point of view and needs. I mean, hey, that's where the money came from.  But I tend to support the idea that innovation is ignited by self ambition and internal needs of self fulfillment. With this idea, one would not easily tempted by market needs. Rather, one would strive from his own desire, to make herself a better person and to produce better ideas based on what she already good at. 

Innovation should not force us to become someone other than ourselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hey, I like this part of your idea:<br />
&#8220;it is something they want to do to become better at what they’re already good at.&#8221; </p>
	<p>To some extent, I agree that we should innovate based on user&#8217;s point of view and needs. I mean, hey, that&#8217;s where the money came from.  But I tend to support the idea that innovation is ignited by self ambition and internal needs of self fulfillment. With this idea, one would not easily tempted by market needs. Rather, one would strive from his own desire, to make herself a better person and to produce better ideas based on what she already good at. </p>
	<p>Innovation should not force us to become someone other than ourselves.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Happy New Year: The Future of Innovation by: businessmodel innovation _ design &#187; Everyone designs &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.design-management.de/archive/2009/01/happy-new-year-the-future-of-innovation/#comment-528712</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 22:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.design-management.de/archive/2009/01/happy-new-year-the-future-of-innovation/#comment-528712</guid>
					<description>[...] On another note, check out Ralf Beuker&amp;#8217;s notes on incremental innovations and design (&amp;#8221;The future of Innovation&amp;#8220;): Let me shortly illustrate my point by showing how Design is facilitating these incremental innovations at Apple Computer. At Apple products you hardly see Design elements as means to make things simply look pretty. Instead they address functions and solutions that make the user feeling ‘Wow!’. Just a few examples are the magnetic power adapter that prevents the computer from accidentally being dragged down, the smooth scroll on the iPhone making searches more ‘real’ or the simplicity of the iMac (one body, a mouse and keyboard). What they stand for is a shifting focus from simply applying new technology (for technology’s sake) to delivering meaning and value by design instead. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>[&#8230;] On another note, check out Ralf Beuker&#8217;s notes on incremental innovations and design (&#8221;The future of Innovation&#8220;): Let me shortly illustrate my point by showing how Design is facilitating these incremental innovations at Apple Computer. At Apple products you hardly see Design elements as means to make things simply look pretty. Instead they address functions and solutions that make the user feeling ‘Wow!’. Just a few examples are the magnetic power adapter that prevents the computer from accidentally being dragged down, the smooth scroll on the iPhone making searches more ‘real’ or the simplicity of the iMac (one body, a mouse and keyboard). What they stand for is a shifting focus from simply applying new technology (for technology’s sake) to delivering meaning and value by design instead. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Happy New Year: The Future of Innovation by: Chris Finlay</title>
		<link>http://www.design-management.de/archive/2009/01/happy-new-year-the-future-of-innovation/#comment-526272</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.design-management.de/archive/2009/01/happy-new-year-the-future-of-innovation/#comment-526272</guid>
					<description>Am with you on the mindset relating to the extremes of innovation. People are always aiming to be the Google or Apple and praying not to be the New Coke or Segway. This is not the way to think about it. It is important to consider a company or project risk profile as well as ability to adopt such an innovation. 

You mention the details of an experience or the micro-interactions adding up to that &quot;wow&quot; feeling. Perhaps it is that &quot;wow&quot; that you relate to gut feeling? That seems right to me but still relates a lot more to usability and good design based on user insight in my mind.

Finally, as someone who is entrenched in the study and development of repeatable and reliable methods of innovation I have some trouble characterizing the over all future of innovation so closely with a &quot;gut feeling&quot;. I do believe &quot;gut feeling&quot; has a lot to do with the powerful pattern recognition and realization mechanism that is the human brain but &quot;gut feeling&quot; is generally characterized by a simple thoughtless reaction that works out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Am with you on the mindset relating to the extremes of innovation. People are always aiming to be the Google or Apple and praying not to be the New Coke or Segway. This is not the way to think about it. It is important to consider a company or project risk profile as well as ability to adopt such an innovation. </p>
	<p>You mention the details of an experience or the micro-interactions adding up to that &#8220;wow&#8221; feeling. Perhaps it is that &#8220;wow&#8221; that you relate to gut feeling? That seems right to me but still relates a lot more to usability and good design based on user insight in my mind.</p>
	<p>Finally, as someone who is entrenched in the study and development of repeatable and reliable methods of innovation I have some trouble characterizing the over all future of innovation so closely with a &#8220;gut feeling&#8221;. I do believe &#8220;gut feeling&#8221; has a lot to do with the powerful pattern recognition and realization mechanism that is the human brain but &#8220;gut feeling&#8221; is generally characterized by a simple thoughtless reaction that works out.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Happy New Year: The Future of Innovation by: erik</title>
		<link>http://www.design-management.de/archive/2009/01/happy-new-year-the-future-of-innovation/#comment-526080</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.design-management.de/archive/2009/01/happy-new-year-the-future-of-innovation/#comment-526080</guid>
					<description>I've noticed at the companies I've worked for that those that are good in innovation often treat it as something organic and natural. Innovation to them is not something that they feel they have to do to stay afloat. To the contrary, it is something they want to do to become better at what they're already good at. Through this experience, I've come to compare innovation to personal growth: when you're forced to grow by outside influences, it really hurts, and it can be quite sudden. But when it stems from internal motivation or ambition, growth is very rewarding. 
And this corresponds very nicely to your view, Ralf, that innovation is often about those little things that just make sense, from a gut feeling perspective. Less groundbreaking, less disruptive but more organic and natural.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;ve noticed at the companies I&#8217;ve worked for that those that are good in innovation often treat it as something organic and natural. Innovation to them is not something that they feel they have to do to stay afloat. To the contrary, it is something they want to do to become better at what they&#8217;re already good at. Through this experience, I&#8217;ve come to compare innovation to personal growth: when you&#8217;re forced to grow by outside influences, it really hurts, and it can be quite sudden. But when it stems from internal motivation or ambition, growth is very rewarding.<br />
And this corresponds very nicely to your view, Ralf, that innovation is often about those little things that just make sense, from a gut feeling perspective. Less groundbreaking, less disruptive but more organic and natural.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Happy New Year: The Future of Innovation by: Ellen</title>
		<link>http://www.design-management.de/archive/2009/01/happy-new-year-the-future-of-innovation/#comment-524878</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.design-management.de/archive/2009/01/happy-new-year-the-future-of-innovation/#comment-524878</guid>
					<description>Ralf I like the focus on how innovation impacts the user, as represented by their &quot;gut feeling.&quot;  The working definition of innovation that I use is &quot;doing something new that adds value to the business.&quot;  In this case, I too incorporate incremental changes as well as more disruptive market changes.  It also incorporates process and business model changes.  What I like about your definition is that it is user focused. Would it be fair to draw the conclusion that an innovation that provides value in the market would evoke a positive gut feeling?  I'm curious to try to connect the internal and external definitions in some way.  What do you think?

Nice post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Ralf I like the focus on how innovation impacts the user, as represented by their &#8220;gut feeling.&#8221;  The working definition of innovation that I use is &#8220;doing something new that adds value to the business.&#8221;  In this case, I too incorporate incremental changes as well as more disruptive market changes.  It also incorporates process and business model changes.  What I like about your definition is that it is user focused. Would it be fair to draw the conclusion that an innovation that provides value in the market would evoke a positive gut feeling?  I&#8217;m curious to try to connect the internal and external definitions in some way.  What do you think?</p>
	<p>Nice post!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
